PRESS RELEASE Sept. 7, 2005:
The Millennium Development Goals, or how the UNO promotes abortion
On September 14 to 16, the UN will hold a "World Summit" where it will
deal with Millennium
Development Goals (MDG). But, these MDG hide some eugenistic goals that
many MDG's supporters have not yet seen.
1. The
grand UNO manipulation
In 2000 UNO launched a great challenge in what it
calls the Millennium
Development Goals (MDG). These are 8 simple goals, able to be approved
by the greatest number. Who would be in favor of poverty? Against
development? 1. Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger
2. Achieve universal primary education
3. Promote gender equality and empower women
4. Reduce child mortality
5. Improve maternal health
6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseases
7. Ensure environmental sustainability
8. Develop a global partnership for development
So some Christians started to campaign in favor of these MDGs, taking
part in demonstrations with white
ribbons, concerts, etc. Their involvement makes possible to re gild the
reputation of UNO, strong weakened by
the scandals of its generalized corruption.
However the MDG actually covers unhealthy, harmful
and criminal objectives: inter
alia, they include the promotion of abortion of the poor. This has a
name: eugenics and malthusianism.
About UN's method: in 2002, the UNO discreetly
launched task forces to define the detail of these MDGs; and the
devil
hides in the details!
These task forces are led by people faithful to the usual goals of UN
(eugenicists,
Malthusians, socialists, etc.) and thus draw odious reports which are
supposed to detail the MDGs. Officially, these
reports from the task forces are only "advisory". But actually, they
are used in the field to assess the "progress" of
the MDGs!
The most blatant example, is the report on "Education and Gender
Equality" [http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/Gender-complete.pdf],
issued in January 2005. It is directed mainly by Nancy Birdsall, who is
an avowed Malthusian.
This "call to action" recommends from cover to cover that « Interventions
to improve
sexual and reproductive health and rights must therefore be a
priority and should occur both within and outside the health system. At
a
minimum, national public health systems must provide quality
family planning services, emergency obstetric care, safe
abortion (where legal), post abortion care, prevention and
treatment of sexually transmitted infections (including HIV), and
interventions to reduce malnutrition and anemia. Outside the health
system sexuality education programs are needed to
lay the foundation for improved sexual and reproductive health
outcomes. Ultimately, these interventions must be supported by an
enabling policy and political environment that guarantees
women's and girls' sexual and reproductive rights. »
This report also recommends the use of statistical indicators to
measure the "performance". In the case of the "Sexual and
reproductive health and rights", these indicators are: «- Proportion of contraceptive demand
satisfied. »
«- Adolescent fertility rate. »
In the field, these indicators are already used. It
can be verified in the countries' reports [http://www.undp.org/mdg/countryreports.html]
that they are already assessing the success of the #5 MDG on
the "contraceptive prevalence" and "the universal access to the family
planning". Let nobody tell us that this is an "advisory"
report!
The vocabulary used by the UN has a benign look. But, in the parlance
and practice of UN, "to guarantees sexual and reproductive
rights" and all the other citations we made, mean without any doubttheir
will to impose abortion, (abortive)
chemical contraception and sex education (outside of parental control)
to the poor, under the pretext of fighting poverty. This is the usual, traditional propaganda and entry points of
the abortion promoters.
2. Why
do we find Christians in this scheme? A very important concern is that we nowhere found within MDG
Christian supporters' documents any contestation of these
criminal goals, nor even the least reservation. [ cf the "Micah Challenge", "Justice and Peace commission",
etc. ]
They spread the UN MDG's propaganda, detailing certain aspects which
they like, but they seem not to see what we are exposing.
But, many clues informed them of this danger:
The environmento-leftists
(pro-abortion) deem the MDG wonderful,
We and others wrote to some Christian MDG promoters
(without receiving any understandable answer to date).
How could Christians imagine
that some good might be drawn from the UNO? Whereas:
UNO
is committed since many years to the promotion of abortion: to kill
the poor is its means of eliminating poverty [cf. for example the
UNFPA, accessory to the forced abortion policy in
China]. UN also participated through this activity in a
greater AIDS
contamination of Africa,
The method of UN is socialist, because it calls upon the
States and its only principle is action, which never
produced anything durably good in the
social field,
The concept of "social
justice" which is subjacent with the MDG is a Marxist concept,
supported by a "liberation theology" which tries to recover life with
the hope of the fabulous budgets UN might grant; this
"social justice" is against justice and the refutation of its theology is
already complete,
The Christian alternative
[Mission + free economy]
does exist and it is the only one working to reduce
misery. But
it works only with Christians who perform charity in
projects that they themselves finance and control, not with joining
Marxist
Robin Hoods who claim they perform charity with the money of others and
the
weapons of the revolutionists.
But will these Christians trapped with the UN's MDGs have enough
courage to
dissociate themselves of it? It would actually be the best way for them
of
not losing the face and of really reducing the world's misery.