CHAPTER III: THE MATERIALS OF THE NEW RACE
EACH of us has an ideal of what the American of the future should be.
We have been told times without number that out of the mixture of stocks, the intermingling
of ideas and aspirations, there is to come a race greater than any which has contributed
to the population of the United States. What is the basis for this hope that is so generally
indulged in? If the hope is founded upon realities, how may it be realized? To understand
the difficulties and the obstacles to be overcome before the dream of a greater race
in America can be attained, is to understand something of the task before the women who
shall give birth to that race.
What material is there for a greater American race? What elements make
up our present millions? Where do they live? How do they live? In what direction does
our national civilization bend their ideals? What is the effect of the "melting
pot" upon the foreigner, once he begins to "melt"? Are we now producing
a freer, juster, more intelligent, more idealistic, creative people out of the varied
Before we can answer these questions, we must consider briefly the races
which have contributed to American population.
Among our more than 100,000,000 population are Negroes, Indians, Chinese
and other colored people to the number of 11,000,000. There are also 14,500,000 persons
of foreign birth. Besides these there are 14,000,000 children of foreign-born parents
and 6,500,000 persons whose fathers or mothers were born on foreign soil, making a total
of 46,000,000 people of foreign stock. Fifty per cent of our population is of the native
Of the foreign stock in the United States, the last general census,
compiled in 1910, shows that 25.7 per cent was German, 14 per cent was Irish, 8.5 per
cent was Russian or Finnish, 7.2 was English, 6.5 per cent Italian and 6.2 per cent Austrian.
The Abstract of the same census points out several significant facts. The Western European
strains in this country are represented by a majority of native-born children of foreign-born
or mixed parentage. This is because the immigration from those sources has been checked.
On the other hand, immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe, including Russia and
Finland, increased 175.4 per cent from 1900 to 1910. During that period, the slums of
Europe dumped their submerged inhabitants into America at a rate almost double that of
the preceding decade, and the flow was still increasing at the time the census was taken.
So it is more than likely that when the next census is taken it will be found that following
1910 there was an even greater flow from Spain, Italy, Hungary, Austria, Russia, Finland,
and other countries where the iron hand of economic and political tyrannies had crushed
great populations into ignorance and want. These peoples have not been in the United
States long enough to produce great families. The census of 1920 will in all probability
tell a story of a greater and more serious problem than did the last.
Over one-fourth of all the immigrants over fourteen years of age, admitted
during the two decades preceding 1910, were illiterate. Of the 8,398,000 who arrived
in the 1900-1910 period, 2,238,000 could not read or write. There were 1,600,000 illiterate
foreigners in the United States when the 1910 census was taken. Do these elements give
promise of a better race? Are we doing anything genuinely constructive to overcome this
Two-thirds of the white foreign stock in the United States live in cities.
Four-fifths of the populations of Chicago and New York are of this stock. More than two-thirds
of the populations of Boston, Cleveland, Detroit, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Milwaukee, Newark,
Jersey City, Providence, Worcester, Scranton, Paterson, Fall River, Lowell, Cambridge,
Bridgeport, St. Paul, Minneapolis and San Francisco are of other than native white ancestry.
Of the fifty principal cities of the United States there are only fourteen in which fifty
per cent of the population is of unmixed native white parentage.
Only one state in the Union; North Carolina; has less than one per cent
of the white foreign stock. New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Massachusetts, Connecticut,
Rhode Island, Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, the Dakotas, Montana and Utah
have more than fifty per cent foreign stock. Eleven states, including those on the Pacific
Coast, have from 35 to 50 per cent. Maine, Ohio and Kansas have from 25 to 35 per cent.
Maryland, Indiana, Missouri and Texas have from 15 to 25 per cent. These proportions
are increasing rather than decreasing, owing to the extraordinarily high birth rate of
the foreign strains.
A special analysis of 1915 vital statistics for certain states, in the
World Almanac for 1918, shows that foreign-born mothers gave birth to nearly 62 per cent
of the children born in Connecticut, nearly 58 per cent in Massachusetts, nearly 33 per
cent in Michigan, nearly 58 per cent in Rhode Island, more than 43 per cent in New Hampshire,
more than 54 per cent in New York and more than 38 per cent in Pennsylvania.
All these figures, be it remembered, fail to include foreign stock of
the second generation after landing. If the statistics for children who have native parents
but foreign-born grandparents, or who have one foreign-born parent, were given, they
would doubtless leave but a small percentage of births from stocks native to the soil
for several generations.
Immigrants or their children constitute the majority of workers employed
in many of our industries. "Seven out of ten of those who work in our iron and steel
industries are drawn from this class," says the National Geographic Magazine
(February, 1917), "seven out of ten of our bituminous coal miners belong to it.
Three out of four who work in packing towns were born abroad or are children of those
who were born abroad; four out of five of those who make our silk goods, seven out of
eight of those employed in woolen mills, nine out of ten of those who refine our petroleum,
and nineteen out of twenty of those who manufacture our sugar are immigrants or the children
of immigrants." And it might have shown a similarly high percentage of those in
the readymade clothing industries, railway and public works construction of the less
skilled sort, and a number of others.
That these foreigners who have come in hordes have brought with them
their ignorance of hygiene and modern ways of living and that they are handicapped by
religious superstitions is only too true. But they also bring in their hearts a desire
for freedom from all the tyrannies that afflict the earth. They would not be here if
they did not bear within them the hardihood of pioneers, a courage of no mean order.
They have the simple faith that in America they will find equality, liberty and an opportunity
for a decent livelihood. And they have something else. The cell plasms of these peoples
are freighted with the potentialities of the best in Old World civilization. They come
from lands rich in the traditions of courage, of art, music, letters, science and philosophy.
Americans no longer consider themselves cultured unless they have journeyed to these
lands to find access to the treasures created by men and women of this same blood. The
immigrant brings the possibilities of all these things to our shores, but where is the
opportunity to reproduce in the New World the cultures of the old?
What opportunities have we given to these peoples to enrich our civilization?
We have greeted them as "a lot of ignorant foreigners," we have shouted at,
bustled and kicked them.
Our industries have taken advantage of their ignorance of the country's
ways to take their toil in mills and mines and factories at starvation wages. We have
herded them into slums to become diseased, to become social burdens or to die. We have
huddled them together like rabbits to multiply their numbers and their misery. Instead
of saying that we Americanize them, we should confess that we animalize them. The only
freedom we seem to have given them is the freedom to make heavier and more secure their
chains. What hope is there for racial progress in this human material, treated more carelessly
and brutally than the cheapest factory product?
Nor are all our social handicaps bound up in the immigrant.
There were in the United States, when the Federal Industrial Relations
Committee finished its work in 1915, several million migratory workers, most of them
white, many of them married but separated from their families, who were compelled, like
themselves, to struggle with dire want.
There were in 1910 more than 2,853,000 tenant farmers, two-thirds of
whom lived and worked under the terrible conditions which the Industrial Relations Commission's
report showed to prevail in the South and Southwest. These tenant farmers, as the report
showed, were always in want, and were compelled by the very terms of the prevailing tenant
contracts to produce children who must go to the fields and do the work of adults. The
census proved that this tenancy was on the increase, the number of tenants in all but
the New England and Middle Atlantic States having increased approximately 80 per cent
from 1900 to 1910.
Moreover, there were in the United States in 1910, 5,516,163 illiterates.
Of these 1,378,884 were of pure native white stock. In some states in the South as much
as 29 per cent of the population is illiterate, many of these, of course, being Negroes.
There is still another factor to be considered; a factor which because
of its great scope is more ominous than any yet mentioned. This is the underpaid mass
of workers in the United States; workers whose low wages are forcing them deeper into
want each day. Let Senator Borah, not a radical nor even a reformer, but a leader of
the Republican party, tell the story. "Fifty-seven per cent of the families in the
United States have incomes of $800 or less," said he in a speech before the Senate,
August 24,1917. "Seventy per cent of the families of our country have incomes of
$1,000 or less. Tell me how a man so situated can have shelter for his family; how he
can provide food and clothing. He is an industrial peon. His home is scant and pinched
beyond the power of language to tell. He sees his wife and children on the ragged edge
of hunger from week to week and month to month. If sickness comes, he faces suicide or
crime. He cannot educate his children; he cannot fit them for citizenship; he cannot
even fit them as soldiers to die for their country.
"It is the tragedy of our whole national life; how these people live in such times as these. We have not yet gathered the fruits of such an industrial condition in this country. We have been saved thus far by reason of the newness of our national life, our vast public lands now almost exhausted, our great natural resources now fast being seized and held, but the hour of reckoning will come."
Senator Borah was thinking, doubtless, of open revolution, of bloodshed
and the destruction of property. In a far more terrible sense, the reckoning which he
has referred to is already upon us. The ills we suffer as the result of the conditions
now prevailing in the United States are appalling in their sum.
It is these conditions that produce the 3,000,000 child laborers of
the United States; child slaves who undergo hardships that blight them physically and
mentally, leaving them fit only to produce human beings whose deficiencies and misfortunes
will exceed their own.
From these same elements, living under these same conditions come the
feebleminded and other defectives. Just how many feebleminded there are in the United
States, no one knows, because no attempt has ever been made to give public care to all
of them, and families are more inclined to conceal than to reveal the mental defects
of their members. Estimates vary from 350,000 at the present time to nearly 400,000 as
early as 1890, Henry H. Goddard, Ph. D., of the Vineland, N. J., Training School, being
authority for the latter statement. Only 34,137 of these unfortunates were under institutional
care in the United States in 1916, the rest being free to propagate their kind; piling
up public burdens for future generations. The feebleminded are notoriously prolific in
reproduction. The close relationship between poverty and ignorance and the production
of feebleminded is shown by Anne Moore, Ph.D., in a report to the Public Education Association
of New York in 1911. She found that an overwhelming proportion of the classified feebleminded
children in New York schools came from large families living in overcrowded slum conditions,
and that only a small percentage were born of native parents.
Sixty thousand prostitutes go and come anew each year in the United
States. This army of unfortunates, as social workers and scientists testify, come from
families living under like conditions of want.
In the New York City schools alone in December, 1916, 61 per cent of
the children were suffering from undernourishment and 21 per cent in immediate danger
of it. These facts, also the result of the conditions outlined, were discovered by the
city Bureau of Child Hygiene.
Another item in the sordid list is that of venereal disease. In his
pamphlet entitled "The Venereal Diseases," issued in 1918, Dr. Hermann
M. Biggs head of the New York State Department of Health quoted authorities who gave
estimates of the amount of syphilis and gonorrhea in the United States. One says that
60 per cent of the men contract one disease or the other at some time. Another said that
40 per cent of the population of New York City had syphilis, one of the most terrible
of all maladies. Poverty, delayed marriage, prostitution; a brief and terrible chain
accounts for this scourge.
Finally, there is tuberculosis, bred by bad housing conditions and contributed
to in frightful measure by poor food and unhealthy surroundings during the hours of employment.
Dr. Frederick L. Hoffman, director of the National Association for the Study and Prevention
of Tuberculosis and foremost statistical authority upon tuberculosis in the United States,
says: "We know of 2,000,000 tubercular persons in the United States."
Does this picture horrify the reader? This is not the whole truth. A
few scattered statistics lack the power to reflect the broken lives of overworked fathers,
the ceaseless, increasing pain of overburdened mothers and the agony of childhood fighting
its way against the handicaps of ill health, insufficient food, inadequate training and
Can we expect to remedy this situation by dismissing the problem of
the submerged native elements with legislative palliatives or treating it with careless
scorn? Do we better it by driving out of the immigrant's heart the dream of liberty that
brought him to our shores? Do we solve the problem by giving him, instead of an opportunity
to develop his own culture, low wages, a home in the slums and those pseudo-patriotic
preachments which constitute our machine-made "Americanization"?
Every detail of this sordid situation means a problem that must be solved
before we can even clear the way for a greater race in America. Nor is there any hope
of solving any of these problems if we continue to attack them in the usual way.
Men have sentimentalized about them and legislated upon them. They have
denounced them and they have applied reforms. But it has all been ridiculously, cruelly
This is the condition of things for which those stand who demand more
and more children. Each child born under such conditions but makes them worse; each child
in its own person suffers the consequence of the intensified evils.
If we are to develop in America a new race with a racial soul, we must
keep the birth rate within the scope of our ability to understand as well as to educate.
We must not encourage reproduction beyond our capacity to assimilate our numbers so as
to make the coming generation into such physically fit, mentally capable, socially alert
individuals as are the ideal of a democracy.
The intelligence of a people is of slow evolutional development; it
lags far behind the reproductive ability. It is far too slow to cope with conditions
created by an increasing population, unless that increase is carefully regulated.
We must, therefore, not permit an increase in population that we are
not prepared to care for to the best advantage; that we are not prepared to do justice
to, educationally and economically. We must popularize birth control thinking. We must
not leave it haphazardly to be the privilege of the already privileged. We must put this
means of freedom and growth into the hands of the masses.
We must set motherhood free. We must give the foreign and submerged
mother knowledge that will enable her to prevent bringing to birth children she does
not want. We know that in each of these submerged and semisubmerged elements of the population
there are rich factors of racial culture. Motherhood is the channel through which these
cultures flow. Motherhood, when free to choose the father, free to choose the time and
the number of children who shall result from the union, automatically works in wondrous
ways. It refuses to bring forth weaklings; refuses to bring forth slaves; refuses to
bear children who must live under the conditions described. It withholds the unfit, brings
forth the fit; brings few children into homes where there is not sufficient to provide
for them. Instinctively it avoids all those things which multiply racial handicaps. Under
such circumstances we can hope that the "melting pot" will refine. We shall
see that it will save the precious metals of racial culture, fused into an amalgam of
physical perfection, mental strength and spiritual progress. Such an American race, containing
the best of all racial elements, could give to the world a vision and a leadership beyond
our present imagination.
<--warning - avertissement | <--index | -->next chapter